Skip to main content
570 TB M10_1A vs 590TBBG-144 14 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144

Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A
Premier Energies
PE-570 TB M10_1A
570 Wp 22.05 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Premier Energies
PE-590TBBG-144
590 Wp 22.83 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

590TBBG-144 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.78 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
14 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

5 of 19 parameters
Parameter 570 TB M10_1A 590TBBG-144 Difference
Module efficiency 22.05 % 22.83 % 0.78 pp more efficient
Weight 28.0 kg 34.0 kg 6.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 49.1 kg/kWp 57.6 kg/kWp 8.5 kg/kWp lighter
Power density 220.7 Wp/m² 228.4 Wp/m² 7.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 570 Wp 590 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
570 TB M10_1A
19,125 kWh
590TBBG-144
19,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 570 TB M10_1A 590TBBG-144
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 570 W 590 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 544 W 563 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 519 W 537 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 493 W 510 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 570 TB M10_1A 590TBBG-144 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 570 Wp 590 Wp +20 W for 590TBBG-144
Module efficiency 22.05 % 22.83 % +0.78 pp for 590TBBG-144
Power density 220.7 Wp/m² 228.4 Wp/m² +7.7 Wp/m² for 590TBBG-144
Open-circuit voltage 51.26 V 51.42 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.99 V 44.15 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.61 A 14.04 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.96 A 13.37 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 28.0 kg 34.0 kg -6.0 kg for 570 TB M10_1A
Weight per kWp 49.1 kg/kWp 57.6 kg/kWp -8.5 kg/kWp for 570 TB M10_1A
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,233 vs #2,683
590TBBG-144 leads by 3,550 places
Power density
#6,058 vs #2,598
590TBBG-144 leads by 3,460 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,756 vs #11,320
570 TB M10_1A leads by 8,564 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,233 vs #3,811
590TBBG-144 leads by 1,422 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-585 TB M10_1A
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-580 TB M10_1A
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-560 TB M10_1A
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A or Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?
According to our database: Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 has higher module efficiency (22.83% vs 22.05%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A has a module efficiency of 22.05%, while Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A use vs Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A uses TOPCon cells; Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?
Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 bifacial panels?
Both Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 1 Premier Energies offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.