565 TB M10_1A vs 590TBBG-144 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144

Q: Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A or Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?

According to our database: Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 has higher module efficiency (22.83% vs 21.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A has a module efficiency of 21.86%, while Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A use vs Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A uses TOPCon cells; Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 bifacial panels?

Both Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Premier Energies

PE-565 TB M10_1A

565 Wp 21.86 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Premier Energies

PE-590TBBG-144

590 Wp 22.83 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

590TBBG-144 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.97 pp more efficient. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences

How alike are they

12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters

Parameter 565 TB M10_1A 590TBBG-144 Difference

Module efficiency 21.86 % 22.83 % 0.97 pp more efficient

Power density 218.7 Wp/m² 228.4 Wp/m² 9.7 Wp/m² higher

Weight 28.0 kg 34.0 kg 6.0 kg lighter

Weight per kWp 49.6 kg/kWp 57.6 kg/kWp 8.1 kg/kWp lighter

Rated power 565 Wp 590 Wp 25 W more power

Short-circuit current 13.50 A 14.04 A 0.54 A apart

Current at max power 12.86 A 13.37 A 0.51 A apart

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

565 TB M10_1A

18,957 kWh

590TBBG-144

19,796 kWh

Lifetime gap

839 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario 565 TB M10_1A 590TBBG-144

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 565 W 590 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 540 W 563 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 514 W 537 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 489 W 510 W

Full specification

Parameter 565 TB M10_1A 590TBBG-144 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 565 Wp 590 Wp +25 W for 590TBBG-144

Module efficiency 21.86 % 22.83 % +0.97 pp for 590TBBG-144

Power density 218.7 Wp/m² 228.4 Wp/m² +9.7 Wp/m² for 590TBBG-144

Open-circuit voltage 51.22 V 51.42 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 43.95 V 44.15 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 13.50 A 14.04 A 0.54 A apart

Current at max power 12.86 A 13.37 A 0.51 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same

Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same

Weight 28.0 kg 34.0 kg -6.0 kg for 565 TB M10_1A

Weight per kWp 49.6 kg/kWp 57.6 kg/kWp -8.1 kg/kWp for 565 TB M10_1A

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 144 144 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#6,962 vs #2,683

590TBBG-144 leads by 4,279 places

Power density

#6,841 vs #2,598

590TBBG-144 leads by 4,243 places

Heat behaviour

#6,093 vs #6,093

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#3,126 vs #11,320

565 TB M10_1A leads by 8,194 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#5,619 vs #3,811

590TBBG-144 leads by 1,808 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Premier Energies

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A

6 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Premier Energies

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-585 TB M10_1A

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Premier Energies

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-580 TB M10_1A

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Premier Energies

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Premier Energies

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

Premier Energies

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-560 TB M10_1A

One difference: module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A or Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?

According to our database: Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 has higher module efficiency (22.83% vs 21.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A has a module efficiency of 21.86%, while Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A use vs Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A uses TOPCon cells; Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144?

Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 bifacial panels?

Both Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 1 Premier Energies offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.