Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
VS
The verdict
13 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MS720N-HJTGB
CME-132BDS-730
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Annual degradation
0.25 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.15 %/yr slower
Module efficiency
23.17 %
23.53 %
0.36 pp more efficient
Weight
38.8 kg
37.0 kg
1.8 kg lighter
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Weight per kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
50.7 kg/kWp
3.2 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
235.3 Wp/m²
3.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
720 Wp
730 Wp
10 W more power
Short-circuit current
17.67 A
18.49 A
0.82 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
50.75 V
49.50 V
1.25 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Current at max power
16.87 A
17.51 A
0.64 A apart
Voltage at max power
42.70 V
41.70 V
1.00 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MS720N-HJTGB
24,721 kWh
CME-132BDS-730
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
228 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MS720N-HJTGB
CME-132BDS-730
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
692 W
698 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
664 W
666 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
636 W
635 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MS720N-HJTGB
CME-132BDS-730
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
730 Wp
+10 W for CME-132BDS-730
Module efficiency
23.17 %
23.53 %
+0.36 pp for CME-132BDS-730
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
235.3 Wp/m²
+3.5 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-730
Open-circuit voltage
50.75 V
49.50 V
1.25 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.70 V
41.70 V
1.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.67 A
18.49 A
0.82 A apart
Current at max power
16.87 A
17.51 A
0.64 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for MS720N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.103 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
38.8 kg
37.0 kg
-1.8 kg for CME-132BDS-730
Weight per kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
50.7 kg/kWp
-3.2 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-730
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.25 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.15 %/yr for MS720N-HJTGB
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,473
vs
#674
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 799 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#672
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 675 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#2,165
MS720N-HJTGB leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#8,017
vs
#4,111
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 3,906 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#27
vs
#7
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 20 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS705N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS700N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB or AE Solar CME-132BDS-730?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has higher module efficiency (23.53% vs 23.17%); Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AE Solar CME-132BDS-730?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB has a module efficiency of 23.17%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 is 23.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB uses HJT cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AE Solar CME-132BDS-730?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 bifacial panels?
Both Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.