Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs AE Solar AE CME-132-720
VS
The verdict
11 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MS720N-HJTGB
AE CME-132-720
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Annual degradation
0.25 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.15 %/yr slower
Weight
38.8 kg
31.5 kg
7.3 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
10.1 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
50.75 V
49.10 V
1.65 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.67 A
18.43 A
0.76 A apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Voltage at max power
42.70 V
41.30 V
1.40 V apart
Current at max power
16.87 A
17.43 A
0.56 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MS720N-HJTGB
24,721 kWh
AE CME-132-720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
564 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MS720N-HJTGB
AE CME-132-720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
692 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
664 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
636 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MS720N-HJTGB
AE CME-132-720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
720 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.17 %
23.21 %
Effectively the same
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
232.1 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
50.75 V
49.10 V
1.65 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.70 V
41.30 V
1.40 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.67 A
18.43 A
0.76 A apart
Current at max power
16.87 A
17.43 A
0.56 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for MS720N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.103 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
38.8 kg
31.5 kg
-7.3 kg for AE CME-132-720
Weight per kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
-10.1 kg/kWp for AE CME-132-720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.25 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.15 %/yr for MS720N-HJTGB
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,473
vs
#1,299
AE CME-132-720 leads by 174 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#1,339
AE CME-132-720 leads by 8 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#2,165
MS720N-HJTGB leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#8,017
vs
#336
AE CME-132-720 leads by 7,681 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#27
vs
#19
AE CME-132-720 leads by 8 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS705N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS700N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
7 differences, the largest is weight
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB or AE Solar AE CME-132-720?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CME-132-720 has higher module efficiency (23.21% vs 23.17%); Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AE Solar AE CME-132-720?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB has a module efficiency of 23.17%, while AE Solar AE CME-132-720 is 23.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB use vs AE Solar AE CME-132-720?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB uses HJT cells; AE Solar AE CME-132-720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AE Solar AE CME-132-720?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CME-132-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AE Solar AE CME-132-720 bifacial panels?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132-720 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.