MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
VS
The verdict
MS740N-HJTGB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
10 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MS740N-HJTGB
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
23.82 %
23.37 %
0.45 pp more efficient
Power density
238.2 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
4.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
740 Wp
725 Wp
15 W more power
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
51.35 V
49.30 V
2.05 V apart
Weight
38.3 kg
37.0 kg
1.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
17.95 A
18.46 A
0.51 A apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Voltage at max power
43.25 V
41.50 V
1.75 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MS740N-HJTGB
24,828 kWh
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MS740N-HJTGB
CME-132BDS-725
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
740 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
713 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
687 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
660 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MS740N-HJTGB
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
740 Wp
725 Wp
+15 W for MS740N-HJTGB
Module efficiency
23.82 %
23.37 %
+0.45 pp for MS740N-HJTGB
Power density
238.2 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
+4.6 Wp/m² for MS740N-HJTGB
Open-circuit voltage
51.35 V
49.30 V
2.05 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.25 V
41.50 V
1.75 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.95 A
18.46 A
0.51 A apart
Current at max power
17.13 A
17.47 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for MS740N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.103 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
38.3 kg
37.0 kg
-1.3 kg for CME-132BDS-725
Weight per kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by MY Solar
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#418
vs
#930
MS740N-HJTGB leads by 512 places
Power density
#431
vs
#923
MS740N-HJTGB leads by 492 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#2,165
MS740N-HJTGB leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#5,125
vs
#4,382
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 743 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3
vs
#11
MS740N-HJTGB leads by 8 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB or AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
According to our database: MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB has higher module efficiency (23.82% vs 23.37%); MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB has a module efficiency of 23.82%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB uses HJT cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 bifacial panels?
Both MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.