MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM
VS
The verdict
MS725N-HJTGB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
7 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MS725N-HJTGB
RCM-725-8DBNM
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Short-circuit current
17.74 A
18.64 A
0.90 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
50.90 V
49.41 V
1.49 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power
42.85 V
41.27 V
1.58 V apart
Current at max power
16.93 A
17.57 A
0.64 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MS725N-HJTGB
24,325 kWh
RCM-725-8DBNM
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MS725N-HJTGB
RCM-725-8DBNM
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
699 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
673 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
647 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MS725N-HJTGB
RCM-725-8DBNM
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
725 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.34 %
23.30 %
Effectively the same
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
Same
Open-circuit voltage
50.90 V
49.41 V
1.49 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.85 V
41.27 V
1.58 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.74 A
18.64 A
0.90 A apart
Current at max power
16.93 A
17.57 A
0.64 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for MS725N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.3 kg
37.8 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by MY Solar
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#943
vs
#1,017
MS725N-HJTGB leads by 74 places
Power density
#936
vs
#936
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#2,165
MS725N-HJTGB leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#6,514
vs
#5,609
RCM-725-8DBNM leads by 905 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#13
vs
#14
MS725N-HJTGB leads by 1 place
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB or Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
According to our database: MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.30%); MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Recom RCM-725-8DBNM is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB use vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB uses HJT cells; Recom RCM-725-8DBNM uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty; Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM bifacial panels?
Both MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 3 Recom offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.