Skip to main content
MS720N-HJTGB vs RCM-725-8DBNM 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM

MY Solar
MS720N-HJTGB
720 Wp 23.17 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM
Recom
RCM-725-8DBNM
725 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

MS720N-HJTGB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter MS720N-HJTGB RCM-725-8DBNM Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Annual degradation 0.25 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Short-circuit current 17.67 A 18.64 A 0.97 A apart
Weight 38.8 kg 37.8 kg 1.0 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 50.75 V 49.41 V 1.34 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 42.70 V 41.27 V 1.43 V apart
Current at max power 16.87 A 17.57 A 0.70 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MS720N-HJTGB
24,721 kWh
RCM-725-8DBNM
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
396 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MS720N-HJTGB RCM-725-8DBNM
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 692 W 693 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 664 W 662 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 636 W 630 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MS720N-HJTGB RCM-725-8DBNM Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 725 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.17 % 23.30 % Effectively the same
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 50.75 V 49.41 V 1.34 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.70 V 41.27 V 1.43 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.67 A 18.64 A 0.97 A apart
Current at max power 16.87 A 17.57 A 0.70 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for MS720N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.8 kg 37.8 kg -1.0 kg for RCM-725-8DBNM
Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.25 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for MS720N-HJTGB
Technology
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,473 vs #1,017
RCM-725-8DBNM leads by 456 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #936
RCM-725-8DBNM leads by 411 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #2,165
MS720N-HJTGB leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#8,017 vs #5,609
RCM-725-8DBNM leads by 2,408 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#27 vs #14
RCM-725-8DBNM leads by 13 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB
4 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB
One difference: temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS715N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS710N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB or Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
According to our database: Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.17%); MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB has a module efficiency of 23.17%, while Recom RCM-725-8DBNM is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB use vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB uses HJT cells; Recom RCM-725-8DBNM uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty; Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM bifacial panels?
Both MY Solar MS720N-HJTGB and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare MY Solar and Recom as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 3 Recom offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.