Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M
VS
The verdict
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.71 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Difference
Module efficiency
23.39 %
24.10 %
0.71 pp more efficient
Rated power
720 Wp
775 Wp
55 W more power
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
241.3 Wp/m²
9.5 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.21 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.14 %/yr slower
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
51.39 V
58.82 V
7.43 V apart
Module area
3.106 m²
3.212 m²
0.106 m² apart
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
3.8 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
HJT
Back Contact
HJT vs Back Contact
Voltage at max power
43.68 V
48.87 V
5.19 V apart
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Short-circuit current
17.54 A
16.71 A
0.83 A apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Current at max power
16.49 A
15.86 A
0.63 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
24,872 kWh
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
26,205 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,333 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
775 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
694 W
745 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
668 W
715 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
642 W
684 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
775 Wp
+55 W for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Module efficiency
23.39 %
24.10 %
+0.71 pp for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
241.3 Wp/m²
+9.5 Wp/m² for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Open-circuit voltage
51.39 V
58.82 V
7.43 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.68 V
48.87 V
5.19 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.54 A
16.71 A
0.83 A apart
Current at max power
16.49 A
15.86 A
0.63 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.212 m²
0.106 m² apart
Weight
38.7 kg
38.7 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
-3.8 kg/kWp for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.21 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.14 %/yr for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
Back Contact
HJT vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#925
vs
#219
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 706 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#227
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 1,120 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#511
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 498 places
Weight
#7,805
vs
#3,297
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 4,508 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#17
vs
#29
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 12 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG or Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M?
According to our database: Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 23.39%); Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG has a module efficiency of 23.39%, while Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M is 24.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG use vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG uses HJT cells; Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG has a 30 years power warranty; Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 9 Luxor Solar offers · See 7 Gokin offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
