Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
VS
The verdict
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
CME-132BDS-720
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Annual degradation
0.21 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.19 %/yr slower
Weight
38.7 kg
37.0 kg
1.7 kg lighter
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
51.39 V
49.10 V
2.29 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.54 A
18.43 A
0.89 A apart
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
51.4 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
43.68 V
41.30 V
2.38 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Current at max power
16.49 A
17.43 A
0.94 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
24,872 kWh
CME-132BDS-720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
715 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
CME-132BDS-720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
694 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
668 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
642 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
CME-132BDS-720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
720 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.39 %
23.21 %
Effectively the same
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
232.1 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
51.39 V
49.10 V
2.29 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.68 V
41.30 V
2.38 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.54 A
18.43 A
0.89 A apart
Current at max power
16.49 A
17.43 A
0.94 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.103 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
38.7 kg
37.0 kg
-1.7 kg for CME-132BDS-720
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
51.4 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.21 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.19 %/yr for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#925
vs
#1,299
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 374 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#1,339
CME-132BDS-720 leads by 8 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#2,165
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#7,805
vs
#4,775
CME-132BDS-720 leads by 3,030 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#17
vs
#22
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 5 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG or AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG has higher module efficiency (23.39% vs 23.21%); Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG has a module efficiency of 23.39%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 is 23.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG uses HJT cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 9 Luxor Solar offers · See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.