Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
VS
The verdict
11 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LX-715M/210-132+GG
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Weight
38.7 kg
37.0 kg
1.7 kg lighter
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
3.5 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
3.1 kg/kWp lighter
Rated power
715 Wp
725 Wp
10 W more power
Short-circuit current
17.49 A
18.46 A
0.97 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
51.19 V
49.30 V
1.89 V apart
Current at max power
16.44 A
17.47 A
1.03 A apart
Voltage at max power
43.51 V
41.50 V
2.01 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LX-715M/210-132+GG
23,990 kWh
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LX-715M/210-132+GG
CME-132BDS-725
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
689 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
664 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
638 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LX-715M/210-132+GG
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
725 Wp
+10 W for CME-132BDS-725
Module efficiency
23.23 %
23.37 %
Effectively the same
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
+3.5 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725
Open-circuit voltage
51.19 V
49.30 V
1.89 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.51 V
41.50 V
2.01 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.49 A
18.46 A
0.97 A apart
Current at max power
16.44 A
17.47 A
1.03 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for LX-715M/210-132+GG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.103 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
38.7 kg
37.0 kg
-1.7 kg for CME-132BDS-725
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
-3.1 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-725
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by Luxor Solar
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,252
vs
#930
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 322 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#923
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 1,095 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#2,165
LX-715M/210-132+GG leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#8,339
vs
#4,382
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 3,957 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#31
vs
#11
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 20 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG or AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 23.23%); Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG has a module efficiency of 23.23%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG uses HJT cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 9 Luxor Solar offers · See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.