Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT
VS
The verdict
6 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is module efficiency: 0.59 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 6 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
6 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LX-715M/210-132+ GG
GSD8K66H-740WT
Difference
Module efficiency
23.23 %
23.82 %
0.59 pp more efficient
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.21 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.14 %/yr slower
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
8.0 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
715 Wp
740 Wp
25 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LX-715M/210-132+ GG
24,699 kWh
GSD8K66H-740WT
25,022 kWh
Lifetime gap
323 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LX-715M/210-132+ GG
GSD8K66H-740WT
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
740 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
689 W
711 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
664 W
682 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
638 W
653 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LX-715M/210-132+ GG
GSD8K66H-740WT
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
740 Wp
+25 W for GSD8K66H-740WT
Module efficiency
23.23 %
23.82 %
+0.59 pp for GSD8K66H-740WT
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
+8.0 Wp/m² for GSD8K66H-740WT
Open-circuit voltage
51.19 V
51.70 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
43.51 V
43.80 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
17.49 A
17.76 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
16.44 A
16.91 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for LX-715M/210-132+ GG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.7 kg
39.0 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for LX-715M/210-132+ GG
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.21 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.14 %/yr for LX-715M/210-132+ GG
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
HJT
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,252
vs
#418
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 834 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#431
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 1,587 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#511
LX-715M/210-132+ GG leads by 498 places
Weight
#8,339
vs
#6,344
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 1,995 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#31
vs
#12
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 19 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+ GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG or Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
According to our database: Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT has higher module efficiency (23.82% vs 23.23%); Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG has a module efficiency of 23.23%, while Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT is 23.82%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG use vs Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG uses HJT cells; Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG has a 30 years power warranty; Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 9 Luxor Solar offers · See 6 Sharp offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
