Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M
VS
The verdict
15 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
15 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR8-66HYD-670M
LR7-54HJBB-490M
Difference
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.00 %
0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power
670 Wp
490 Wp
180 W more power
Weight
33.5 kg
23.5 kg
10.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
30 yrs
18 yrs longer
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
240.1 Wp/m²
8.0 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
50.12 V
41.25 V
8.87 V apart
Module area
2.701 m²
2.041 m²
0.660 m² apart
Short-circuit current
16.86 A
15.04 A
1.82 A apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Voltage at max power
41.38 V
34.07 V
7.31 V apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Current at max power
16.19 A
14.38 A
1.81 A apart
Weight per kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
2.0 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR8-66HYD-670M
22,480 kWh
LR7-54HJBB-490M
16,440 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,040 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR8-66HYD-670M
LR7-54HJBB-490M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
670 W
490 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
644 W
472 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
618 W
455 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
592 W
437 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR8-66HYD-670M
LR7-54HJBB-490M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
670 Wp
490 Wp
+180 W for LR8-66HYD-670M
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.00 %
+0.80 pp for LR8-66HYD-670M
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
240.1 Wp/m²
+8.0 Wp/m² for LR8-66HYD-670M
Open-circuit voltage
50.12 V
41.25 V
8.87 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.38 V
34.07 V
7.31 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.86 A
15.04 A
1.82 A apart
Current at max power
16.19 A
14.38 A
1.81 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for LR7-54HJBB-490M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.041 m²
0.660 m² apart
Weight
33.5 kg
23.5 kg
-10.0 kg for LR7-54HJBB-490M
Weight per kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
-2.0 kg/kWp for LR7-54HJBB-490M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
30 yrs
+18 yrs for LR7-54HJBB-490M
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.35 %/yr
Not published by Longi Solar
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12
vs
#303
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 291 places
Power density
#14
vs
#313
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 299 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#13
LR7-54HJBB-490M leads by 498 places
Weight
#3,317
vs
#1,984
LR7-54HJBB-490M leads by 1,333 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#490
vs
#2,149
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 1,659 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HYD-660M
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HYD-655M
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-650M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M or Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.00%); Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M and Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M is 24.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M use vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M uses Back Contact cells; Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M and Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M and Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M bifacial panels?
Both Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M and Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 172 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

