Skip to main content
LR8-66HGD-620M vs LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W

Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M
LR8-66HGD-620M
620 Wp 23.00 % Back Contact Bifacial
VS
Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
Leapton
LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
590 Wp 22.83 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

LR8-66HGD-620M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 30 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter LR8-66HGD-620M LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W Difference
Rated power 620 Wp 590 Wp 30 W more power
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs 13 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module area 2.701 m² 2.584 m² 0.117 m² apart
Cell technology Back Contact TOPCon Back Contact vs TOPCon
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 15.32 A 0.73 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x30 mm
Current at max power 15.16 A 14.49 A 0.67 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR8-66HGD-620M
20,802 kWh
LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
19,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,006 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LR8-66HGD-620M LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 590 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 594 W 563 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 568 W 537 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 542 W 510 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LR8-66HGD-620M LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 590 Wp +30 W for LR8-66HGD-620M
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.83 % Effectively the same
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 228.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.78 V 48.62 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.91 V 40.72 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 15.32 A 0.73 A apart
Current at max power 15.16 A 14.49 A 0.67 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for LR8-66HGD-620M
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 2.584 m² 0.117 m² apart
Weight 32.5 kg 32.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 54.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs +13 yrs for LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact TOPCon Back Contact vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #2,683
LR8-66HGD-620M leads by 764 places
Power density
#2,191 vs #2,731
LR8-66HGD-620M leads by 540 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #6,093
LR8-66HGD-620M leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#5,893 vs #8,477
LR8-66HGD-620M leads by 2,584 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,525 vs #1,591
LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W leads by 934 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-625M
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-615M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-610M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-605M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-600M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-595M
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M or Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.83%); Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M use vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M uses Back Contact cells; Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?
Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W bifacial panels?
Both Longi Solar LR8-66HGD-620M and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Longi Solar and Leapton as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 147 Longi Solar offers · See 5 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.