Skip to main content
72HVHF-670M vs 54HJD-500M 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M

Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M
LR7-72HVHF-670M
670 Wp 24.80 % N-type
VS
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M
LR7-54HJD-500M
500 Wp 24.50 % Back Contact Bifacial
The verdict

14 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 170 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter 72HVHF-670M 54HJD-500M Difference
Rated power 670 Wp 500 Wp 170 W more power
Weight 28.5 kg 23.5 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage 54.30 V 41.35 V 12.95 V apart
Module area 2.701 m² 2.041 m² 0.660 m² apart
Module efficiency 24.80 % 24.50 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp 42.5 kg/kWp 47.0 kg/kWp 4.5 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Power density 248.0 Wp/m² 245.0 Wp/m² 3.1 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 44.96 V 34.17 V 10.79 V apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
72HVHF-670M
22,655 kWh
54HJD-500M
16,907 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,748 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 72HVHF-670M 54HJD-500M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 670 W 500 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 644 W 482 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 618 W 464 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 592 W 446 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 72HVHF-670M 54HJD-500M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 670 Wp 500 Wp +170 W for 72HVHF-670M
Module efficiency 24.80 % 24.50 % +0.30 pp for 72HVHF-670M
Power density 248.0 Wp/m² 245.0 Wp/m² +3.1 Wp/m² for 72HVHF-670M
Open-circuit voltage 54.30 V 41.35 V 12.95 V apart
Voltage at max power 44.96 V 34.17 V 10.79 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.60 A 15.30 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.91 A 14.63 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for 54HJD-500M
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 2.041 m² 0.660 m² apart
Weight 28.5 kg 23.5 kg -5.0 kg for 54HJD-500M
Weight per kWp 42.5 kg/kWp 47.0 kg/kWp -4.5 kg/kWp for 72HVHF-670M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for 54HJD-500M
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12 vs #74
72HVHF-670M leads by 62 places
Power density
#14 vs #77
72HVHF-670M leads by 63 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #13
54HJD-500M leads by 498 places
Weight
#226 vs #1,450
72HVHF-670M leads by 1,224 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#284 vs #1,611
72HVHF-670M leads by 1,327 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-650M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-640M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M or Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.50%); Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M is 24.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M use vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M uses N-type cells; Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 147 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.