Skip to main content
LR7-72HVHF-670M vs LR5-54HIB-405M 2 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M

Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M
LR7-72HVHF-670M
670 Wp 24.80 % N-type
VS
Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M
LR5-54HIB-405M
405 Wp 20.70 % PERC
The verdict

LR7-72HVHF-670M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 4.10 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 17 differences
How alike are they
2 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

17 of 19 parameters
Parameter LR7-72HVHF-670M LR5-54HIB-405M Difference
Module efficiency 24.80 % 20.70 % 4.10 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.080 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 670 Wp 405 Wp 265 W more power
Power density 248.0 Wp/m² 207.4 Wp/m² 40.6 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.55 %/yr 0.20 %/yr slower
Weight 28.5 kg 21.5 kg 7.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 42.5 kg/kWp 53.1 kg/kWp 10.5 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 54.30 V 37.15 V 17.15 V apart
Module area 2.701 m² 1.953 m² 0.748 m² apart
Short-circuit current 15.60 A 13.78 A 1.82 A apart
Cell technology N-type PERC N-type vs PERC
Voltage at max power 44.96 V 31.18 V 13.78 V apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Current at max power 14.91 A 12.99 A 1.92 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR7-72HVHF-670M
22,655 kWh
LR5-54HIB-405M
13,126 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,529 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LR7-72HVHF-670M LR5-54HIB-405M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 670 W 405 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 644 W 384 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 618 W 364 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 592 W 343 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LR7-72HVHF-670M LR5-54HIB-405M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 670 Wp 405 Wp +265 W for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Module efficiency 24.80 % 20.70 % +4.10 pp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Power density 248.0 Wp/m² 207.4 Wp/m² +40.6 Wp/m² for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Open-circuit voltage 54.30 V 37.15 V 17.15 V apart
Voltage at max power 44.96 V 31.18 V 13.78 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.60 A 13.78 A 1.82 A apart
Current at max power 14.91 A 12.99 A 1.92 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.080 %/°C for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 1.953 m² 0.748 m² apart
Weight 28.5 kg 21.5 kg -7.0 kg for LR5-54HIB-405M
Weight per kWp 42.5 kg/kWp 53.1 kg/kWp -10.5 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.55 %/yr -0.20 %/yr for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Technology
Cell technology N-type PERC N-type vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12 vs #10,764
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 10,752 places
Power density
#14 vs #10,626
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 10,612 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #8,778
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 8,267 places
Weight
#226 vs #6,847
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 6,621 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,798
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#284 vs #11,948
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 11,664 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-650M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-640M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M or Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 20.70%); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M is 20.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M use vs Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M uses N-type cells; Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 172 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.