Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw
VS
The verdict
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR7-72HVHF-670M
AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw
Difference
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.00 %
0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power
670 Wp
770 Wp
100 W more power
Weight
28.5 kg
39.8 kg
11.3 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
42.5 kg/kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
9.2 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
239.7 Wp/m²
8.3 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
54.30 V
58.72 V
4.42 V apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.212 m²
0.511 m² apart
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Short-circuit current
15.60 A
16.64 A
1.04 A apart
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
44.96 V
48.77 V
3.81 V apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Current at max power
14.91 A
15.79 A
0.88 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LR7-72HVHF-670M
22,480 kWh
AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw
25,835 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR7-72HVHF-670M
AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
670 W
770 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
644 W
740 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
618 W
710 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
592 W
680 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR7-72HVHF-670M
AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
670 Wp
770 Wp
+100 W for AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.00 %
+0.80 pp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
239.7 Wp/m²
+8.3 Wp/m² for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Open-circuit voltage
54.30 V
58.72 V
4.42 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.96 V
48.77 V
3.81 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.60 A
16.64 A
1.04 A apart
Current at max power
14.91 A
15.79 A
0.88 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.212 m²
0.511 m² apart
Weight
28.5 kg
39.8 kg
-11.3 kg for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Weight per kWp
42.5 kg/kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
-9.2 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by AIKO
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12
vs
#303
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 291 places
Power density
#14
vs
#347
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 333 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#226
vs
#5,072
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 4,846 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#284
vs
#40
AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw leads by 244 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-650M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-640M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M or AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw is 24.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M use vs AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M uses N-type cells; AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw bifacial panels?
AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 174 Longi Solar offers · See 179 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

