Skip to main content
72HVDF-660M vs 60HVHL-560M 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M vs Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M

Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M
LR7-72HVDF-660M
660 Wp 24.40 % N-type Bifacial
VS
LR7-60HVHL-560M
560 Wp 24.80 % Back Contact
The verdict

60HVHL-560M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 100 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter 72HVDF-660M 60HVHL-560M Difference
Rated power 660 Wp 560 Wp 100 W more power
Weight 33.5 kg 16.3 kg 17.2 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 50.8 kg/kWp 29.1 kg/kWp 21.7 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 24.40 % 24.80 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 54.42 V 45.28 V 9.14 V apart
Module area 2.701 m² 2.257 m² 0.445 m² apart
Power density 244.3 Wp/m² 248.2 Wp/m² 3.8 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Voltage at max power 45.07 V 37.51 V 7.56 V apart
Cell count 144 120 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1990x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1990x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
72HVDF-660M
22,317 kWh
60HVHL-560M
18,935 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,382 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 72HVDF-660M 60HVHL-560M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 660 W 560 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 634 W 538 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 609 W 516 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 583 W 494 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 72HVDF-660M 60HVHL-560M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 660 Wp 560 Wp +100 W for 72HVDF-660M
Module efficiency 24.40 % 24.80 % +0.40 pp for 60HVHL-560M
Power density 244.3 Wp/m² 248.2 Wp/m² +3.8 Wp/m² for 60HVHL-560M
Open-circuit voltage 54.42 V 45.28 V 9.14 V apart
Voltage at max power 45.07 V 37.51 V 7.56 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.30 A 15.65 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.65 A 14.93 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1990x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1990x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 2.257 m² 0.445 m² apart
Weight 33.5 kg 16.3 kg -17.2 kg for 60HVHL-560M
Weight per kWp 50.8 kg/kWp 29.1 kg/kWp -21.7 kg/kWp for 60HVHL-560M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 120 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#99 vs #12
60HVHL-560M leads by 87 places
Power density
#88 vs #12
60HVHL-560M leads by 76 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,172 vs #130
60HVHL-560M leads by 4,042 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#576 vs #1,683
72HVDF-660M leads by 1,107 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-650M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-645M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-640M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M or Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M and Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M has a module efficiency of 24.40%, while Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M use vs Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M uses N-type cells; Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M and Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M and Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-660M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-560M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 174 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.