Skip to main content
HD132N-705W vs HD108N-R2-500 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500

Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W
Jolywood
JW-HD132N-705W
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jolywood
JW-HD108N-R2-500
500 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

11 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 205 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter HD132N-705W HD108N-R2-500 Difference
Rated power 705 Wp 500 Wp 205 W more power
Weight 38.1 kg 27.3 kg 10.8 kg lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs 13 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 47.78 V 39.03 V 8.75 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.20 A 15.78 A 2.42 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.223 m² 0.884 m² apart
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.50 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power 41.00 V 33.50 V 7.50 V apart
Current at max power 17.20 A 14.92 A 2.28 A apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1960x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HD132N-705W
23,654 kWh
HD108N-R2-500
16,776 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,878 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HD132N-705W HD108N-R2-500
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 705 W 500 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 675 W 479 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 646 W 458 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 616 W 437 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HD132N-705W HD108N-R2-500 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 705 Wp 500 Wp +205 W for HD132N-705W
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.50 % +0.20 pp for HD132N-705W
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 225.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 47.78 V 39.03 V 8.75 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.00 V 33.50 V 7.50 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.20 A 15.78 A 2.42 A apart
Current at max power 17.20 A 14.92 A 2.28 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1960x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.223 m² 0.884 m² apart
Weight 38.1 kg 27.3 kg -10.8 kg for HD108N-R2-500
Weight per kWp 54.0 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs +13 yrs for HD108N-R2-500
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,307 vs #4,222
HD132N-705W leads by 915 places
Power density
#3,361 vs #4,450
HD132N-705W leads by 1,089 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,262 vs #8,949
HD132N-705W leads by 687 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,007 vs #4,561
HD132N-705W leads by 3,554 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W or Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.