Skip to main content
HD108N-R2-500 vs HD132N-705 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705

Jolywood
JW-HD108N-R2-500
500 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705
Jolywood
JW-HD132N-705
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

11 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 205 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter HD108N-R2-500 HD132N-705 Difference
Rated power 500 Wp 705 Wp 205 W more power
Weight 27.3 kg 38.1 kg 10.8 kg lighter
Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs 13 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 39.03 V 47.78 V 8.75 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.78 A 18.20 A 2.42 A apart
Module area 2.223 m² 3.106 m² 0.884 m² apart
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.70 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power 33.50 V 41.00 V 7.50 V apart
Current at max power 14.92 A 17.20 A 2.28 A apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HD108N-R2-500
16,776 kWh
HD132N-705
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,878 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HD108N-R2-500 HD132N-705
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 500 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 479 W 675 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 458 W 646 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 437 W 616 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HD108N-R2-500 HD132N-705 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 500 Wp 705 Wp +205 W for HD132N-705
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.70 % +0.20 pp for HD132N-705
Power density 225.0 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 39.03 V 47.78 V 8.75 V apart
Voltage at max power 33.50 V 41.00 V 7.50 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.78 A 18.20 A 2.42 A apart
Current at max power 14.92 A 17.20 A 2.28 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.223 m² 3.106 m² 0.884 m² apart
Weight 27.3 kg 38.1 kg -10.8 kg for HD108N-R2-500
Weight per kWp 54.6 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs +13 yrs for HD108N-R2-500
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #3,307
HD132N-705 leads by 915 places
Power density
#4,450 vs #3,361
HD132N-705 leads by 1,089 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,949 vs #8,262
HD132N-705 leads by 687 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,561 vs #1,007
HD132N-705 leads by 3,554 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-515
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-505
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-705?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-705?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-705?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 45 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.