Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV
VS
The verdict
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.96 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV
Difference
Module efficiency
22.48 %
21.52 %
0.96 pp more efficient
Rated power
500 Wp
430 Wp
70 W more power
Power density
224.8 Wp/m²
215.2 Wp/m²
9.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight
27.0 kg
22.0 kg
5.0 kg lighter
Module area
2.224 m²
1.998 m²
0.226 m² apart
Short-circuit current
15.63 A
14.19 A
1.44 A apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Weight per kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
51.2 kg/kWp
2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
40.38 V
38.58 V
1.80 V apart
Current at max power
14.73 A
13.42 A
1.31 A apart
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power
33.95 V
32.04 V
1.91 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
16,776 kWh
JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV
14,427 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,349 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
500 W
430 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
478 W
411 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
457 W
393 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
435 W
374 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
500 Wp
430 Wp
+70 W for JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
Module efficiency
22.48 %
21.52 %
+0.96 pp for JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
Power density
224.8 Wp/m²
215.2 Wp/m²
+9.6 Wp/m² for JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
Open-circuit voltage
40.38 V
38.58 V
1.80 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.95 V
32.04 V
1.91 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.63 A
14.19 A
1.44 A apart
Current at max power
14.73 A
13.42 A
1.31 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.224 m²
1.998 m²
0.226 m² apart
Weight
27.0 kg
22.0 kg
-5.0 kg for JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV
Weight per kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
51.2 kg/kWp
-2.8 kg/kWp for JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,565
vs
#7,853
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV leads by 3,288 places
Power density
#4,468
vs
#7,816
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV leads by 3,348 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,183
vs
#4,522
JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV leads by 3,661 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,659
vs
#9,980
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV leads by 3,321 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM515-54HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM510-54HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM505-54HL4M-BDV
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV or Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV has higher module efficiency (22.48% vs 21.52%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV has a module efficiency of 22.48%, while Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV is 21.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV use vs Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM430N-54HL4R-BDV are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 170 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
