Skip to main content
JS310P vs JS325P 14 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS310P vs Jinko Solar JS325P

JS310P
310 Wp 15.90 % PERC Incomplete
VS
JS325P
325 Wp 16.70 % PERC Incomplete
The verdict

JS325P leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 14 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
14 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

4 of 18 parameters
Parameter JS310P JS325P Difference
Module efficiency 15.90 % 16.70 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Power density 159.8 Wp/m² 167.5 Wp/m² 7.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 310 Wp 325 Wp 15 W more power
Weight per kWp 75.8 kg/kWp 72.3 kg/kWp 3.5 kg/kWp lighter
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.420 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JS310P
10,401 kWh
JS325P
10,904 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JS310P JS325P
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 310 W 325 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 93.7% of rated power 290 W 305 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 87.4% of rated power 271 W 284 W
Hot roof 70 °C 81.1% of rated power 251 W 264 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JS310P JS325P Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 310 Wp 325 Wp +15 W for JS325P
Module efficiency 15.90 % 16.70 % +0.80 pp for JS325P
Power density 159.8 Wp/m² 167.5 Wp/m² +7.7 Wp/m² for JS325P
Open-circuit voltage 45.31 V 46.21 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 36.70 V 37.41 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 9.00 A 9.18 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 8.45 A 8.69 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.420 %/°C -0.420 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1956x992x40 mm 1956x992x40 mm Same
Module area 1.940 m² 1.940 m² Same
Weight 23.5 kg 23.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 75.8 kg/kWp 72.3 kg/kWp -3.5 kg/kWp for JS325P
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 10 yrs 10 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Polycrystalline Polycrystalline Same
Cell count 72 72 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#13,662 vs #13,522
JS325P leads by 140 places
Power density
#13,641 vs #13,505
JS325P leads by 136 places
Heat behaviour
#13,796 vs #13,796
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#13,628 vs #13,508
JS325P leads by 120 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#13,616 vs #13,480
JS325P leads by 136 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS310P vs Jinko Solar JS330P
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS310P vs Jinko Solar JS320P
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS310P vs Jinko Solar JS315P
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JS310P vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
18 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JS310P vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
18 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JS310P vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
18 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS310P or Jinko Solar JS325P?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS325P has higher module efficiency (16.70% vs 15.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS310P and Jinko Solar JS325P?
Jinko Solar JS310P has a module efficiency of 15.90%, while Jinko Solar JS325P is 16.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS310P use vs Jinko Solar JS325P?
Jinko Solar JS310P uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS325P uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS310P and Jinko Solar JS325P?
Jinko Solar JS310P has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS325P has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 170 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.