Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510
VS
The verdict
JS182MHC132-510 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.68 pp more efficient. 8 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
9 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JS182MHC120-450
JS182MHC132-510
Difference
Module efficiency
20.79 %
21.47 %
0.68 pp more efficient
Rated power
450 Wp
510 Wp
60 W more power
Power density
207.9 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
6.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight
23.0 kg
26.0 kg
3.0 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
41.40 V
45.60 V
4.20 V apart
Module area
2.165 m²
2.375 m²
0.210 m² apart
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
34.70 V
38.40 V
3.70 V apart
Dimensions
1909x1134x30 mm
2094x1134x30 mm
1909x1134x30 mm vs 2094x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JS182MHC120-450
14,936 kWh
JS182MHC132-510
16,928 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,992 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JS182MHC120-450
JS182MHC132-510
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
450 W
510 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
427 W
484 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
404 W
458 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
381 W
432 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JS182MHC120-450
JS182MHC132-510
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
450 Wp
510 Wp
+60 W for JS182MHC132-510
Module efficiency
20.79 %
21.47 %
+0.68 pp for JS182MHC132-510
Power density
207.9 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
+6.9 Wp/m² for JS182MHC132-510
Open-circuit voltage
41.40 V
45.60 V
4.20 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.70 V
38.40 V
3.70 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.68 A
13.94 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
12.96 A
13.39 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1909x1134x30 mm
2094x1134x30 mm
1909x1134x30 mm vs 2094x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.165 m²
2.375 m²
0.210 m² apart
Weight
23.0 kg
26.0 kg
-3.0 kg for JS182MHC120-450
Weight per kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#10,558
vs
#8,240
JS182MHC132-510 leads by 2,318 places
Power density
#10,500
vs
#8,130
JS182MHC132-510 leads by 2,370 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,436
vs
#4,341
JS182MHC132-510 leads by 95 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#12,249
vs
#10,867
JS182MHC132-510 leads by 1,382 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-545
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-530
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 or Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has higher module efficiency (21.47% vs 20.79%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 has a module efficiency of 20.79%, while Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 is 21.47%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 use vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-450 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 174 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.