JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M
VS
The verdict
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM66D46-720/LB
LR7-72HVHF-670M
Difference
Module efficiency
23.20 %
24.80 %
1.60 pp more efficient
Rated power
720 Wp
670 Wp
50 W more power
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
16.3 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight
38.2 kg
28.5 kg
9.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
42.5 kg/kWp
10.5 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
49.00 V
54.30 V
5.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.59 A
15.60 A
2.99 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.701 m²
0.405 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Current at max power
17.48 A
14.91 A
2.57 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
41.19 V
44.96 V
3.77 V apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM66D46-720/LB
24,157 kWh
LR7-72HVHF-670M
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,502 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM66D46-720/LB
LR7-72HVHF-670M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
689 W
644 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
657 W
618 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
626 W
592 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM66D46-720/LB
LR7-72HVHF-670M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
670 Wp
+50 W for JAM66D46-720/LB
Module efficiency
23.20 %
24.80 %
+1.60 pp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
+16.3 Wp/m² for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Open-circuit voltage
49.00 V
54.30 V
5.30 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.19 V
44.96 V
3.77 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.59 A
15.60 A
2.99 A apart
Current at max power
17.48 A
14.91 A
2.57 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.701 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
38.2 kg
28.5 kg
-9.7 kg for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Weight per kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
42.5 kg/kWp
-10.5 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,306
vs
#12
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 1,294 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#14
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 1,333 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#6,810
vs
#226
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 6,584 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#516
vs
#284
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 232 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB or Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 23.20%); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB and Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M?
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB has a module efficiency of 23.20%, while Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB use vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M?
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB uses TOPCon cells; Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB and Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M?
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB and Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 386 JA Solar offers · See 174 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

