Skip to main content
JAM66D45-610/LB vs JAM66D46-740/LB 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB

JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB
JAM66D45-610/LB
610 Wp 22.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
JAM66D46-740/LB
740 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JAM66D46-740/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.20 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM66D45-610/LB JAM66D46-740/LB Difference
Module efficiency 22.60 % 23.80 % 1.20 pp more efficient
Rated power 610 Wp 740 Wp 130 W more power
Power density 225.8 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² 12.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight 33.1 kg 38.2 kg 5.1 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 18.73 A 2.68 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Current at max power 15.34 A 17.64 A 2.30 A apart
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 51.6 kg/kWp 2.6 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.10 V 49.80 V 1.70 V apart
Voltage at max power 39.77 V 41.96 V 2.19 V apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM66D45-610/LB
20,467 kWh
JAM66D46-740/LB
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,361 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM66D45-610/LB JAM66D46-740/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 610 W 740 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 583 W 708 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 557 W 676 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 530 W 643 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM66D45-610/LB JAM66D46-740/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 610 Wp 740 Wp +130 W for JAM66D46-740/LB
Module efficiency 22.60 % 23.80 % +1.20 pp for JAM66D46-740/LB
Power density 225.8 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² +12.4 Wp/m² for JAM66D46-740/LB
Open-circuit voltage 48.10 V 49.80 V 1.70 V apart
Voltage at max power 39.77 V 41.96 V 2.19 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 18.73 A 2.68 A apart
Current at max power 15.34 A 17.64 A 2.30 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 33.1 kg 38.2 kg -5.1 kg for JAM66D45-610/LB
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 51.6 kg/kWp -2.6 kg/kWp for JAM66D46-740/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,658 vs #433
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 3,225 places
Power density
#3,729 vs #431
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 3,298 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,515 vs #4,997
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 3,518 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,289 vs #185
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 3,104 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-630/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-615/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-605/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D30-580/LB/1500V
13 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB or JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 386 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.