JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M
VS
The verdict
LR7-54HVB-480M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 2 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
16 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM60D41-510/LB
LR7-54HVB-480M
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.50 %
0.50 pp more efficient
Rated power
510 Wp
480 Wp
30 W more power
Weight
27.3 kg
21.6 kg
5.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
45.0 kg/kWp
8.5 kg/kWp lighter
Module area
2.215 m²
2.041 m²
0.174 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
44.25 V
40.29 V
3.96 V apart
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
235.2 Wp/m²
4.9 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
37.31 V
33.28 V
4.03 V apart
Cell count
120
108
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Short-circuit current
14.54 A
15.13 A
0.59 A apart
Dimensions
1953x1134x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm
1953x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Current at max power
13.67 A
14.43 A
0.76 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM60D41-510/LB
17,112 kWh
LR7-54HVB-480M
16,230 kWh
Lifetime gap
882 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM60D41-510/LB
LR7-54HVB-480M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
510 W
480 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
488 W
461 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
466 W
443 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
443 W
424 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM60D41-510/LB
LR7-54HVB-480M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
510 Wp
480 Wp
+30 W for JAM60D41-510/LB
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.50 %
+0.50 pp for LR7-54HVB-480M
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
235.2 Wp/m²
+4.9 Wp/m² for LR7-54HVB-480M
Open-circuit voltage
44.25 V
40.29 V
3.96 V apart
Voltage at max power
37.31 V
33.28 V
4.03 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.54 A
15.13 A
0.59 A apart
Current at max power
13.67 A
14.43 A
0.76 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for LR7-54HVB-480M
Mechanical
Dimensions
1953x1134x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm
1953x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.215 m²
2.041 m²
0.174 m² apart
Weight
27.3 kg
21.6 kg
-5.7 kg for LR7-54HVB-480M
Weight per kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
45.0 kg/kWp
-8.5 kg/kWp for LR7-54HVB-480M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
-
Not published by Longi Solar
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for LR7-54HVB-480M
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
108
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,919
vs
#716
LR7-54HVB-480M leads by 1,203 places
Power density
#1,849
vs
#718
LR7-54HVB-480M leads by 1,131 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
LR7-54HVB-480M leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#7,509
vs
#598
LR7-54HVB-480M leads by 6,911 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,280
vs
#9,198
JAM60D41-510/LB leads by 2,918 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-630/LB
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-615/LB
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-605/LB
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB or Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.00%); Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB and Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M?
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB use vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M?
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB uses TOPCon cells; Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB and Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M?
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB and Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM60D41-510/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 391 JA Solar offers · See 174 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
