Skip to main content
JAM54S40-455/LR vs JAM54D40-465/LR 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR

JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR
JAM54S40-455/LR
455 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon
VS
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR
JAM54D40-465/LR
465 Wp 23.30 % N-type
The verdict

JAM54D40-465/LR leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM54S40-455/LR JAM54D40-465/LR Difference
Module efficiency 22.80 % 23.30 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 232.7 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight 20.0 kg 22.0 kg 2.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 44.0 kg/kWp 47.3 kg/kWp 3.4 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Rated power 455 Wp 465 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM54S40-455/LR
15,266 kWh
JAM54D40-465/LR
15,602 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM54S40-455/LR JAM54D40-465/LR
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 455 W 465 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 435 W 445 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 415 W 425 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 396 W 404 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM54S40-455/LR JAM54D40-465/LR Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 455 Wp 465 Wp +10 W for JAM54D40-465/LR
Module efficiency 22.80 % 23.30 % +0.50 pp for JAM54D40-465/LR
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 232.7 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for JAM54D40-465/LR
Open-circuit voltage 39.50 V 40.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.00 V 33.50 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.56 A 14.65 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.79 A 13.88 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 20.0 kg 22.0 kg -2.0 kg for JAM54S40-455/LR
Weight per kWp 44.0 kg/kWp 47.3 kg/kWp -3.4 kg/kWp for JAM54S40-455/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,714 vs #1,017
JAM54D40-465/LR leads by 1,697 places
Power density
#2,888 vs #1,115
JAM54D40-465/LR leads by 1,773 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#365 vs #1,632
JAM54S40-455/LR leads by 1,267 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,691 vs #6,780
JAM54D40-465/LR leads by 911 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR vs JA Solar JAT54S40-485/LR
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR vs JA Solar JAT54S40-480/LR
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR vs JA Solar JAT54S40-475/LR
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR vs JA Solar JAT54S40-470/LR
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR or JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR and JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR?
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR use vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR?
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR and JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR?
JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.