JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB
VS
The verdict
JAM54D40-465/LR leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 250 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM54D40-465/LR
JAM66D46-715/LB
Difference
Rated power
465 Wp
715 Wp
250 W more power
Weight
22.0 kg
38.2 kg
16.2 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
6.1 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
40.20 V
48.80 V
8.60 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.65 A
18.55 A
3.90 A apart
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.30 %
23.00 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
33.50 V
41.00 V
7.50 V apart
Current at max power
13.88 A
17.44 A
3.56 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM54D40-465/LR
15,602 kWh
JAM66D46-715/LB
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,388 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM54D40-465/LR
JAM66D46-715/LB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
465 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
445 W
684 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
425 W
653 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
404 W
622 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM54D40-465/LR
JAM66D46-715/LB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
465 Wp
715 Wp
+250 W for JAM66D46-715/LB
Module efficiency
23.30 %
23.00 %
+0.30 pp for JAM54D40-465/LR
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
40.20 V
48.80 V
8.60 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.50 V
41.00 V
7.50 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.65 A
18.55 A
3.90 A apart
Current at max power
13.88 A
17.44 A
3.56 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
22.0 kg
38.2 kg
-16.2 kg for JAM54D40-465/LR
Weight per kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
-6.1 kg/kWp for JAM54D40-465/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for JAM54D40-465/LR
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,017
vs
#1,919
JAM54D40-465/LR leads by 902 places
Power density
#1,115
vs
#2,018
JAM54D40-465/LR leads by 903 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,632
vs
#7,356
JAM54D40-465/LR leads by 5,724 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,780
vs
#678
JAM66D46-715/LB leads by 6,102 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM54S40-460/LR
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LR
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR or JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR uses N-type cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 391 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.