Skip to main content
JAM54D40-465/LB vs CS6.2-48TD-460 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460

JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB
JAM54D40-465/LB
465 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460
CS6.2-48TD-460
460 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JAM54D40-465/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 10 yrs longer. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM54D40-465/LB CS6.2-48TD-460 Difference
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs 10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 47.3 kg/kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 6.2 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 39.70 V 53.30 V 13.60 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.07 A 10.82 A 4.25 A apart
Weight 22.0 kg 24.6 kg 2.6 kg lighter
Module efficiency 23.30 % 23.00 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power 33.33 V 45.20 V 11.87 V apart
Current at max power 13.95 A 10.18 A 3.77 A apart
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM54D40-465/LB
15,602 kWh
CS6.2-48TD-460
15,434 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM54D40-465/LB CS6.2-48TD-460
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 465 W 460 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 445 W 440 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 425 W 420 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 404 W 400 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM54D40-465/LB CS6.2-48TD-460 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 465 Wp 460 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.30 % 23.00 % +0.30 pp for JAM54D40-465/LB
Power density 232.7 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 39.70 V 53.30 V 13.60 V apart
Voltage at max power 33.33 V 45.20 V 11.87 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.07 A 10.82 A 4.25 A apart
Current at max power 13.95 A 10.18 A 3.77 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 22.0 kg 24.6 kg -2.6 kg for JAM54D40-465/LB
Weight per kWp 47.3 kg/kWp 53.5 kg/kWp -6.2 kg/kWp for JAM54D40-465/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs +10 yrs for CS6.2-48TD-460
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #1,919
JAM54D40-465/LB leads by 902 places
Power density
#1,115 vs #1,876
JAM54D40-465/LB leads by 761 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,632 vs #7,436
JAM54D40-465/LB leads by 5,804 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,780 vs #5,285
CS6.2-48TD-460 leads by 1,495 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LB
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LB
2 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-455/LB
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D41 455/LB
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB or Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460?
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB use vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460?
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB uses TOPCon cells; Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460?
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare JA Solar and Canadian Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 391 JA Solar offers · See 38 Canadian Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.