Skip to main content
YH720W-33MHD/MH vs S720M66HT4BF 14 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF

IBC Solar
YH720W-33MHD/MH
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF
Shinson Technology
S720M66HT4BF
720 Wp 23.18 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

S720M66HT4BF leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.090 %/°C better in heat. 14 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
14 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

4 of 18 parameters
Parameter YH720W-33MHD/MH S720M66HT4BF Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.090 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Voltage at max power 41.52 V 42.68 V 1.16 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
YH720W-33MHD/MH
24,157 kWh
S720M66HT4BF
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario YH720W-33MHD/MH S720M66HT4BF
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 720 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 682 W 692 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 644 W 664 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 607 W 636 W
03

Full specification

Parameter YH720W-33MHD/MH S720M66HT4BF Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 720 Wp Same
Module efficiency 23.18 % 23.18 % Same
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 49.82 V 50.74 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.52 V 42.68 V 1.16 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.13 A 17.67 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.34 A 16.87 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.090 %/°C for S720M66HT4BF
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.0 kg 38.7 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 52.8 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.35 %/yr Not published by IBC Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,424 vs #1,424
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #511
S720M66HT4BF leads by 9,908 places
Weight
#6,459 vs #7,805
YH720W-33MHD/MH leads by 1,346 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#24 vs #25
YH720W-33MHD/MH leads by 1 place
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH710W-33MHD/MH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S705M66HT4BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH or Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF?
According to our database: Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH use vs Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon cells; Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty; Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF bifacial panels?
Both IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH and Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare IBC Solar and Shinson Technology as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 2 IBC Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.