Skip to main content
18X-555W vs 18X 560W 17 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560W

HT-SAAE
HT72-18X-555W
555 Wp 21.50 % PERC
VS
HT-SAAE
HT72-18X 560W
560 Wp 21.70 % PERC Incomplete
The verdict

18X 560W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 17 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See the one difference
How alike are they
17 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

1 of 18 parameters
Parameter 18X-555W 18X 560W Difference
Module efficiency 21.50 % 21.70 % 0.20 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.330 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
18X-555W
18,322 kWh
18X 560W
18,487 kWh
Lifetime gap
165 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 18X-555W 18X 560W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 555 W 560 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.0% of rated power 528 W 532 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.1% of rated power 500 W 505 W
Hot roof 70 °C 85.2% of rated power 473 W 477 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 18X-555W 18X 560W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 555 Wp 560 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 21.50 % 21.70 % +0.20 pp for 18X 560W
Power density 214.8 Wp/m² 216.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.95 V 50.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.10 V 42.25 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 14.14 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.20 A 13.27 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.330 %/°C -0.330 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2279x1134x35 mm 2279x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.584 m² 2.584 m² Same
Weight 28.5 kg 28.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.4 kg/kWp 50.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.60 %/yr - Not published by HT-SAAE
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,958 vs #7,421
18X 560W leads by 537 places
Power density
#8,148 vs #7,538
18X 560W leads by 610 places
Heat behaviour
#8,545 vs #8,545
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,712 vs #4,264
18X 560W leads by 448 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,808 vs #4,387
18X 560W leads by 421 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X-560W
2 differences, the largest is cell technology
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 555W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X-550W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 545W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X-545W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W or HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560 W has higher module efficiency (21.70% vs 21.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W and HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560W?
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555 W has a module efficiency of 21.50%, while HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560 W is 21.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W use vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560W?
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555 W uses PERC cells; HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555W and HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560W?
HT-SAAE HT72-18X-555 W has a 25 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.