Skip to main content
HS700TC-MHG-D vs HS435TC-MHC-D 7 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D vs Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D

HS700TC-MHG-D
700 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
HS435TC-MHC-D
435 Wp 21.80 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

HS700TC-MHG-D leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
7 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

11 of 18 parameters
Parameter HS700TC-MHG-D HS435TC-MHC-D Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 21.80 % 0.70 pp more efficient
Rated power 700 Wp 435 Wp 265 W more power
Weight 38.5 kg 24.5 kg 14.0 kg lighter
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 217.7 Wp/m² 7.6 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 48.60 V 35.52 V 13.08 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.32 A 15.56 A 2.76 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Voltage at max power 40.50 V 29.52 V 10.98 V apart
Current at max power 17.29 A 14.74 A 2.55 A apart
Cell count 132 96 36 cells apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HS700TC-MHG-D
23,486 kWh
HS435TC-MHC-D
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,891 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HS700TC-MHG-D HS435TC-MHC-D
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 435 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 671 W 417 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 641 W 398 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 612 W 380 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HS700TC-MHG-D HS435TC-MHC-D Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 435 Wp +265 W for HS700TC-MHG-D
Module efficiency 22.50 % 21.80 % +0.70 pp for HS700TC-MHG-D
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 217.7 Wp/m² +7.6 Wp/m² for HS700TC-MHG-D
Open-circuit voltage 48.60 V 35.52 V 13.08 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.50 V 29.52 V 10.98 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.32 A 15.56 A 2.76 A apart
Current at max power 17.29 A 14.74 A 2.55 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 38.5 kg 24.5 kg -14.0 kg for HS435TC-MHC-D
Weight per kWp 55.0 kg/kWp 56.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 96 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #7,022
HS700TC-MHG-D leads by 2,800 places
Power density
#3,989 vs #7,066
HS700TC-MHG-D leads by 3,077 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,361 vs #10,568
HS700TC-MHG-D leads by 1,207 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#960 vs #9,727
HS700TC-MHG-D leads by 8,767 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D vs Horay Solar HS720TC-MHG-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D vs Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D vs Horay Solar HS690TC-MHG-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D vs Horay Solar HS680TC-MHG-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D vs Horay Solar HS455TC-MHC-D
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D vs Horay Solar HS450TC-MHC-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D or Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D?
According to our database: Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D and Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D?
Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D is 21.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D use vs Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D?
Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D uses TOPCon cells; Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D and Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D?
Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D has a 30 years power warranty; Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D and Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D bifacial panels?
Both Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D and Horay Solar HS435TC-MHC-D are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.