Skip to main content
HN21RN-54HT500W vs HN21N-66HT725W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT725W

Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W
Hanersun
HN21RN-54HT500W
500 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Hanersun HN21N-66HT725W
Hanersun
HN21N-66HT725W
725 Wp 23.30 % N-type Bifacial
The verdict

HN21N-66HT725W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter HN21RN-54HT500W HN21N-66HT725W Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.30 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power 500 Wp 725 Wp 225 W more power
Weight 26.4 kg 37.4 kg 11.0 kg lighter
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs 10 yrs longer
Power density 224.8 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 8.5 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 39.90 V 49.20 V 9.30 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.95 A 18.54 A 2.59 A apart
Module area 2.224 m² 3.106 m² 0.883 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Voltage at max power 33.24 V 41.40 V 8.16 V apart
Current at max power 15.05 A 17.52 A 2.47 A apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HN21RN-54HT500W
16,776 kWh
HN21N-66HT725W
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,549 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HN21RN-54HT500W HN21N-66HT725W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 500 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 479 W 695 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 458 W 664 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 437 W 634 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HN21RN-54HT500W HN21N-66HT725W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 500 Wp 725 Wp +225 W for HN21N-66HT725W
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.30 % +0.80 pp for HN21N-66HT725W
Power density 224.8 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +8.5 Wp/m² for HN21N-66HT725W
Open-circuit voltage 39.90 V 49.20 V 9.30 V apart
Voltage at max power 33.24 V 41.40 V 8.16 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.95 A 18.54 A 2.59 A apart
Current at max power 15.05 A 17.52 A 2.47 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.224 m² 3.106 m² 0.883 m² apart
Weight 26.4 kg 37.4 kg -11.0 kg for HN21RN-54HT500W
Weight per kWp 52.8 kg/kWp 51.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs +10 yrs for HN21RN-54HT500W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #1,017
HN21N-66HT725W leads by 3,205 places
Power density
#4,468 vs #936
HN21N-66HT725W leads by 3,532 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,476 vs #4,959
HN21N-66HT725W leads by 1,517 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,524 vs #263
HN21N-66HT725W leads by 4,261 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT745W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT740W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT730W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT720W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W or Hanersun HN21N-66HT725W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN21N-66HT725 W has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W and Hanersun HN21N-66HT725W?
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500 W has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Hanersun HN21N-66HT725 W is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W use vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT725W?
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500 W uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN21N-66HT725 W uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W and Hanersun HN21N-66HT725W?
Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500 W has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN21N-66HT725 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500W and Hanersun HN21N-66HT725W bifacial panels?
Both Hanersun HN21RN-54HT500 W and Hanersun HN21N-66HT725 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 19 Hanersun offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.