Skip to main content
M156-WF-585 vs T144-GF-580Wp 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 vs Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580Wp

Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585
Goldi Solar
GS10-M156-WF-585
585 Wp 20.90 % PERC
VS
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580Wp
Goldi Solar
GS10-T144-GF-580Wp
580 Wp 22.45 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

T144-GF-580Wp leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.55 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter M156-WF-585 T144-GF-580Wp Difference
Module efficiency 20.90 % 22.45 % 1.55 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density 209.5 Wp/m² 224.5 Wp/m² 15.1 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Module area 2.793 m² 2.583 m² 0.210 m² apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell count 156 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2465x1133x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2465x1133x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Cell type Polycrystalline Monocrystalline Polycrystalline vs Monocrystalline
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
M156-WF-585
18,959 kWh
T144-GF-580Wp
19,460 kWh
Lifetime gap
501 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario M156-WF-585 T144-GF-580Wp
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 585 W 580 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 555 W 554 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 525 W 528 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 495 W 502 W
03

Full specification

Parameter M156-WF-585 T144-GF-580Wp Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 585 Wp 580 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 20.90 % 22.45 % +1.55 pp for T144-GF-580Wp
Power density 209.5 Wp/m² 224.5 Wp/m² +15.1 Wp/m² for T144-GF-580Wp
Open-circuit voltage 53.73 V 52.95 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 45.11 V 45.50 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.86 A 13.61 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.97 A 12.75 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for T144-GF-580Wp
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1133x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2465x1133x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.793 m² 2.583 m² 0.210 m² apart
Weight 31.5 kg 31.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 54.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for T144-GF-580Wp
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for T144-GF-580Wp
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Polycrystalline Monocrystalline Polycrystalline vs Monocrystalline
Cell count 156 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#10,072 vs #4,620
T144-GF-580Wp leads by 5,452 places
Power density
#9,957 vs #4,547
T144-GF-580Wp leads by 5,410 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #6,093
T144-GF-580Wp leads by 2,685 places
Weight
#7,897 vs #8,548
M156-WF-585 leads by 651 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #21
T144-GF-580Wp leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#7,235 vs #4,547
T144-GF-580Wp leads by 2,688 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-595
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 vs Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-590
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 vs Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-590Wp
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 vs Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-585Wp
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 or Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580Wp?
According to our database: Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580 Wp has higher module efficiency (22.45% vs 20.90%); Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580 Wp tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 and Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580Wp?
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 has a module efficiency of 20.90%, while Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580 Wp is 22.45%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 use vs Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580Wp?
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 uses PERC cells; Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580 Wp uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 and Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580Wp?
Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 has a 25 years power warranty; Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580 Wp has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 and Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580Wp bifacial panels?
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-580 Wp is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.