Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB
VS
The verdict
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.13 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
MS720N-HJTGB
Difference
Module efficiency
24.30 %
23.17 %
1.13 pp more efficient
Rated power
780 Wp
720 Wp
60 W more power
Power density
242.8 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
11.1 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
58.92 V
50.75 V
8.17 V apart
Module area
3.212 m²
3.106 m²
0.106 m² apart
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.25 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Weight per kWp
49.6 kg/kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
4.3 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
Back Contact
HJT
Back Contact vs HJT
Voltage at max power
48.97 V
42.70 V
6.27 V apart
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Short-circuit current
16.78 A
17.67 A
0.89 A apart
Dimensions
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Current at max power
15.93 A
16.87 A
0.94 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
26,374 kWh
MS720N-HJTGB
24,721 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,653 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
MS720N-HJTGB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
780 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
750 W
692 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
719 W
664 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
689 W
636 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
MS720N-HJTGB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
780 Wp
720 Wp
+60 W for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Module efficiency
24.30 %
23.17 %
+1.13 pp for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Power density
242.8 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+11.1 Wp/m² for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Open-circuit voltage
58.92 V
50.75 V
8.17 V apart
Voltage at max power
48.97 V
42.70 V
6.27 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.78 A
17.67 A
0.89 A apart
Current at max power
15.93 A
16.87 A
0.94 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
3.212 m²
3.106 m²
0.106 m² apart
Weight
38.7 kg
38.8 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
49.6 kg/kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
-4.3 kg/kWp for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
+15 yrs for MS720N-HJTGB
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.25 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for MS720N-HJTGB
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
HJT
Back Contact vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#131
vs
#1,473
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 1,342 places
Power density
#138
vs
#1,347
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 1,209 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,161
vs
#8,017
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 4,856 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#15
vs
#27
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 12 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-770M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-765M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-760M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M or Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB?
According to our database: Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M has higher module efficiency (24.30% vs 23.17%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M and Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB is 23.17%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M use vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M uses Back Contact cells; Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M and Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M has a 30 years power warranty; Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M and Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB bifacial panels?
Both Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M and Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 7 Gokin offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
