HY-NT10/72GDF-595W vs 3SHBGH-C#-635 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635

Q: Which panel is better: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W or GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635?

According to our database: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.40%); GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W use vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W uses TOPCon cells; GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W has a 30 years power warranty; GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 bifacial panels?

Both GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

GL Solar

HY-NT10/72GDF-595W

595 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

GL Solar

3SHBGH-C#-635

635 Wp 22.40 % HJT Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

14 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 40 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences

How alike are they

5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters

Parameter HY-NT10/72GDF-595W 3SHBGH-C#-635 Difference

Rated power 595 Wp 635 Wp 40 W more power

Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.40 % 0.60 pp more efficient

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat

Weight 32.1 kg 36.0 kg 3.9 kg lighter

Open-circuit voltage 52.35 V 45.65 V 6.70 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.19 A 17.52 A 3.33 A apart

Module area 2.583 m² 2.830 m² 0.247 m² apart

Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 224.4 Wp/m² 6.0 Wp/m² higher

Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT

Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 56.7 kg/kWp 2.7 kg/kWp lighter

Voltage at max power 44.34 V 38.72 V 5.62 V apart

Current at max power 13.42 A 16.41 A 2.99 A apart

Cell count 144 120 24 cells apart

Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

HY-NT10/72GDF-595W

19,963 kWh

3SHBGH-C#-635

21,077 kWh

Lifetime gap

1,114 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario HY-NT10/72GDF-595W 3SHBGH-C#-635

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 595 W 635 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 569 W 610 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 543 W 585 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 517 W 561 W

Full specification

Parameter HY-NT10/72GDF-595W 3SHBGH-C#-635 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 595 Wp 635 Wp +40 W for 3SHBGH-C#-635

Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.40 % +0.60 pp for HY-NT10/72GDF-595W

Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 224.4 Wp/m² +6.0 Wp/m² for HY-NT10/72GDF-595W

Open-circuit voltage 52.35 V 45.65 V 6.70 V apart

Voltage at max power 44.34 V 38.72 V 5.62 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.19 A 17.52 A 3.33 A apart

Current at max power 13.42 A 16.41 A 2.99 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for 3SHBGH-C#-635

Mechanical

Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm

Module area 2.583 m² 2.830 m² 0.247 m² apart

Weight 32.1 kg 36.0 kg -3.9 kg for HY-NT10/72GDF-595W

Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 56.7 kg/kWp -2.7 kg/kWp for HY-NT10/72GDF-595W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 144 120 24 cells apart

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#1,919 vs #4,774

HY-NT10/72GDF-595W leads by 2,855 places

Power density

#1,758 vs #4,734

HY-NT10/72GDF-595W leads by 2,976 places

Heat behaviour

#2,165 vs #511

3SHBGH-C#-635 leads by 1,654 places

Weight

#8,146 vs #10,807

HY-NT10/72GDF-595W leads by 2,661 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#2,769 vs #2,176

3SHBGH-C#-635 leads by 593 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-605W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-600W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-590W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-640

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630

The same specification on paper

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W or GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635?

According to our database: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.40%); GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595 W has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W use vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595 W uses TOPCon cells; GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595 W has a 30 years power warranty; GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 bifacial panels?

Both GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595 W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 GL Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.