Skip to main content
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 vs NT12/66GDF-730 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-730

GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445
445 Wp 22.27 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
GCL NT12/66GDF-730
NT12/66GDF-730
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NT12/66GDF-730 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.23 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 NT12/66GDF-730 Difference
Module efficiency 22.27 % 23.50 % 1.23 pp more efficient
Rated power 445 Wp 730 Wp 285 W more power
Power density 222.7 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 12.3 Wp/m² higher
Weight 21.5 kg 38.3 kg 16.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 35.68 V 49.02 V 13.34 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.50 A 18.64 A 3.14 A apart
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight per kWp 48.3 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 4.2 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 30.15 V 41.22 V 11.07 V apart
Current at max power 14.76 A 17.71 A 2.95 A apart
Cell count 96 132 36 cells apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445
14,931 kWh
NT12/66GDF-730
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,562 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 NT12/66GDF-730
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 445 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 426 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 406 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 387 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 NT12/66GDF-730 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 445 Wp 730 Wp +285 W for NT12/66GDF-730
Module efficiency 22.27 % 23.50 % +1.23 pp for NT12/66GDF-730
Power density 222.7 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +12.3 Wp/m² for NT12/66GDF-730
Open-circuit voltage 35.68 V 49.02 V 13.34 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.15 V 41.22 V 11.07 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.50 A 18.64 A 3.14 A apart
Current at max power 14.76 A 17.71 A 2.95 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 21.5 kg 38.3 kg -16.8 kg for GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445
Weight per kWp 48.3 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp -4.2 kg/kWp for GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 132 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,481 vs #716
NT12/66GDF-730 leads by 4,765 places
Power density
#5,302 vs #800
NT12/66GDF-730 leads by 4,502 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,192 vs #5,993
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 leads by 3,801 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,381 vs #312
NT12/66GDF-730 leads by 9,069 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-520W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-515W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-505W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-500W
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-495W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 or GCL NT12/66GDF-730?
According to our database: GCL NT12/66GDF-730 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 and GCL NT12/66GDF-730?
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 has a module efficiency of 22.27%, while GCL NT12/66GDF-730 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 use vs GCL NT12/66GDF-730?
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 uses TOPCon cells; GCL NT12/66GDF-730 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 and GCL NT12/66GDF-730?
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL NT12/66GDF-730 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 and GCL NT12/66GDF-730 bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-445 and GCL NT12/66GDF-730 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.