Skip to main content
NT12/66GDF-740 vs NT12R/48GDF 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF

GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
740 Wp 23.82 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
GCL-NT12R/48GDF
475 Wp 23.77 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

9 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 265 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter NT12/66GDF-740 NT12R/48GDF Difference
Rated power 740 Wp 475 Wp 265 W more power
Weight 38.2 kg 24.5 kg 13.7 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.46 V 36.30 V 13.16 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.72 A 16.23 A 2.49 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Voltage at max power 41.60 V 30.75 V 10.85 V apart
Current at max power 17.79 A 15.45 A 2.34 A apart
Cell count 132 96 36 cells apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NT12/66GDF-740
24,828 kWh
NT12R/48GDF
15,937 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,891 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NT12/66GDF-740 NT12R/48GDF
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 740 W 475 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 708 W 454 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 676 W 434 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 643 W 413 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NT12/66GDF-740 NT12R/48GDF Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 740 Wp 475 Wp +265 W for NT12/66GDF-740
Module efficiency 23.82 % 23.77 % Effectively the same
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 237.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.46 V 36.30 V 13.16 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.60 V 30.75 V 10.85 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.72 A 16.23 A 2.49 A apart
Current at max power 17.79 A 15.45 A 2.34 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 38.2 kg 24.5 kg -13.7 kg for NT12R/48GDF
Weight per kWp 51.6 kg/kWp 51.6 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 96 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#418 vs #499
NT12/66GDF-740 leads by 81 places
Power density
#431 vs #467
NT12/66GDF-740 leads by 36 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,997 vs #4,954
NT12R/48GDF leads by 43 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#181 vs #6,608
NT12/66GDF-740 leads by 6,427 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 or GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF?
According to our database: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 has higher module efficiency (23.82% vs 23.77%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 and GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 has a module efficiency of 23.82%, while GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF is 23.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 use vs GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 uses TOPCon cells; GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 and GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 and GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 and GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.