Skip to main content
66GDF 720 vs 66GDF-740 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740

GCL-NT12/66GDF 720
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
740 Wp 23.82 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

66GDF-740 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.64 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 66GDF 720 66GDF-740 Difference
Module efficiency 23.18 % 23.82 % 0.64 pp more efficient
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² 6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 720 Wp 740 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
66GDF 720
24,157 kWh
66GDF-740
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 66GDF 720 66GDF-740
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 740 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 689 W 708 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 657 W 676 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 626 W 643 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 66GDF 720 66GDF-740 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 740 Wp +20 W for 66GDF-740
Module efficiency 23.18 % 23.82 % +0.64 pp for 66GDF-740
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² +6.4 Wp/m² for 66GDF-740
Open-circuit voltage 48.58 V 49.46 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.84 V 41.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.55 A 18.72 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.63 A 17.79 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.2 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 51.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by GCL
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,424 vs #418
66GDF-740 leads by 1,006 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #431
66GDF-740 leads by 916 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,025 vs #4,997
66GDF-740 leads by 2,028 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#540 vs #181
66GDF-740 leads by 359 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 725
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 or GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740?
According to our database: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 has higher module efficiency (23.82% vs 23.18%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 and GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 is 23.82%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 use vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 uses TOPCon cells; GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 and GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 and GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 720 and GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.