Skip to main content
GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 vs NT12/66GDF-725 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-725

GCL-NT12/66GDF 715
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
GCL NT12/66GDF-725
NT12/66GDF-725
725 Wp 23.34 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NT12/66GDF-725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.32 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 NT12/66GDF-725 Difference
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.34 % 0.32 pp more efficient
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 715 Wp 725 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
GCL-NT12/66GDF 715
23,990 kWh
NT12/66GDF-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 NT12/66GDF-725
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 684 W 693 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 653 W 662 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 622 W 630 W
03

Full specification

Parameter GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 NT12/66GDF-725 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 725 Wp +10 W for NT12/66GDF-725
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.34 % +0.32 pp for NT12/66GDF-725
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for NT12/66GDF-725
Open-circuit voltage 48.36 V 48.80 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.65 V 41.03 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.51 A 18.60 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.59 A 17.67 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.3 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by GCL
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #943
NT12/66GDF-725 leads by 854 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #936
NT12/66GDF-725 leads by 1,082 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,566 vs #6,514
NT12/66GDF-725 leads by 1,052 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#678 vs #403
NT12/66GDF-725 leads by 275 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 or GCL NT12/66GDF-725?
According to our database: GCL NT12/66GDF-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 and GCL NT12/66GDF-725?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while GCL NT12/66GDF-725 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 use vs GCL NT12/66GDF-725?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 uses TOPCon cells; GCL NT12/66GDF-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 and GCL NT12/66GDF-725?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL NT12/66GDF-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 and GCL NT12/66GDF-725 bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 715 and GCL NT12/66GDF-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.