Emmvee E720HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E600HCBG144-T
VS
The verdict
9 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 120 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
E720HCBG132-T
E600HCBG144-T
Difference
Rated power
720 Wp
600 Wp
120 W more power
Weight
37.8 kg
32.0 kg
5.8 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
18.56 A
14.61 A
3.95 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.583 m²
0.523 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
48.60 V
52.27 V
3.67 V apart
Current at max power
17.85 A
13.89 A
3.96 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
40.36 V
43.23 V
2.87 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E720HCBG132-T
24,157 kWh
E600HCBG144-T
20,131 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,026 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
E720HCBG132-T
E600HCBG144-T
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
600 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
689 W
574 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
657 W
548 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
626 W
522 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
E720HCBG132-T
E600HCBG144-T
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
600 Wp
+120 W for E720HCBG132-T
Module efficiency
23.18 %
23.23 %
Effectively the same
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
232.3 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
48.60 V
52.27 V
3.67 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.36 V
43.23 V
2.87 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.56 A
14.61 A
3.95 A apart
Current at max power
17.85 A
13.89 A
3.96 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.583 m²
0.523 m² apart
Weight
37.8 kg
32.0 kg
-5.8 kg for E600HCBG144-T
Weight per kWp
52.5 kg/kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,424
vs
#1,252
E600HCBG144-T leads by 172 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#1,252
E600HCBG144-T leads by 95 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,043
vs
#7,236
E720HCBG132-T leads by 1,193 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#540
vs
#2,935
E720HCBG132-T leads by 2,395 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Emmvee E720HCBG132-T or Emmvee E600HCBG144-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E600HCBG144-T has higher module efficiency (23.23% vs 23.18%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E720HCBG132-T and Emmvee E600HCBG144-T?
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Emmvee E600HCBG144-T is 23.23%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E720HCBG132-T use vs Emmvee E600HCBG144-T?
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E600HCBG144-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E720HCBG132-T and Emmvee E600HCBG144-T?
Emmvee E720HCBG132-T has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E600HCBG144-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E720HCBG132-T and Emmvee E600HCBG144-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E720HCBG132-T and Emmvee E600HCBG144-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.