Skip to main content
665NT66-HU/BF-DG vs 590M60-HU/BF-DG 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG

EGing PV
EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG
665 Wp 21.40 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG
EGing PV
EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG
590 Wp 20.84 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

665NT66-HU/BF-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.040 %/°C better in heat. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter 665NT66-HU/BF-DG 590M60-HU/BF-DG Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 665 Wp 590 Wp 75 W more power
Module efficiency 21.40 % 20.84 % 0.56 pp more efficient
Weight 38.3 kg 35.0 kg 3.3 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 46.78 V 41.31 V 5.47 V apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Power density 214.1 Wp/m² 208.5 Wp/m² 5.6 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power 38.99 V 34.21 V 4.78 V apart
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.45 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
665NT66-HU/BF-DG
22,312 kWh
590M60-HU/BF-DG
19,429 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,883 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 665NT66-HU/BF-DG 590M60-HU/BF-DG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 665 W 590 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 635 W 560 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 605 W 530 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 575 W 500 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 665NT66-HU/BF-DG 590M60-HU/BF-DG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 665 Wp 590 Wp +75 W for 665NT66-HU/BF-DG
Module efficiency 21.40 % 20.84 % +0.56 pp for 665NT66-HU/BF-DG
Power density 214.1 Wp/m² 208.5 Wp/m² +5.6 Wp/m² for 665NT66-HU/BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage 46.78 V 41.31 V 5.47 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.99 V 34.21 V 4.78 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.07 A 18.30 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.06 A 17.25 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for 665NT66-HU/BF-DG
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 35.0 kg -3.3 kg for 590M60-HU/BF-DG
Weight per kWp 57.6 kg/kWp 59.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.45 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for 665NT66-HU/BF-DG
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,323 vs #10,421
665NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 2,098 places
Power density
#8,250 vs #10,359
665NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 2,109 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #8,778
665NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 2,685 places
Weight
#11,303 vs #12,099
665NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 796 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,833 vs #6,044
665NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 3,211 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG or EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG?
According to our database: EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG has higher module efficiency (21.40% vs 20.84%); EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG has a module efficiency of 21.40%, while EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG is 20.84%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG use vs EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG bifacial panels?
Both EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-590M60-HU/BF-DG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 EGing PV offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.