DH132NE-635W vs DH132NC-700 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700

Q: Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 bifacial panels?

Both DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

DAS Solar

DAS-DH132NE-635W

635 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

DAS Solar

DAS-DH132NC-700

700 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

DH132NE-635W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences

How alike are they

10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters

Parameter DH132NE-635W DH132NC-700 Difference

Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.50 % 1.00 pp more efficient

Rated power 635 Wp 700 Wp 65 W more power

Power density 235.1 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² 9.7 Wp/m² higher

Weight 31.9 kg 38.3 kg 6.4 kg lighter

Short-circuit current 16.29 A 18.34 A 2.05 A apart

Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart

Weight per kWp 50.2 kg/kWp 54.7 kg/kWp 4.5 kg/kWp lighter

Current at max power 15.49 A 17.32 A 1.83 A apart

Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

DH132NE-635W

21,306 kWh

DH132NC-700

23,486 kWh

Lifetime gap

2,180 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario DH132NE-635W DH132NC-700

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 635 W 700 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 608 W 671 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 582 W 641 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 555 W 612 W

Full specification

Parameter DH132NE-635W DH132NC-700 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 635 Wp 700 Wp +65 W for DH132NC-700

Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.50 % +1.00 pp for DH132NE-635W

Power density 235.1 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² +9.7 Wp/m² for DH132NE-635W

Open-circuit voltage 48.88 V 48.52 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 41.00 V 40.42 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 16.29 A 18.34 A 2.05 A apart

Current at max power 15.49 A 17.32 A 1.83 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart

Weight 31.9 kg 38.3 kg -6.4 kg for DH132NE-635W

Weight per kWp 50.2 kg/kWp 54.7 kg/kWp -4.5 kg/kWp for DH132NE-635W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 132 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#716 vs #4,222

DH132NE-635W leads by 3,506 places

Power density

#741 vs #3,989

DH132NE-635W leads by 3,248 places

Heat behaviour

#1,309 vs #1,309

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#3,682 vs #9,103

DH132NE-635W leads by 5,421 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#1,437 vs #944

DH132NC-700 leads by 493 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715

9 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710

9 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705

9 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695

9 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635 W has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635 W has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 bifacial panels?

Both DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-635 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.