Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS
VS
The verdict
CS7N-730TB-AG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.40 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
16 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CS7N-730TB-AG
CS6L-455MS
Difference
Module efficiency
23.50 %
21.10 %
2.40 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
730 Wp
455 Wp
275 W more power
Power density
235.0 Wp/m²
210.8 Wp/m²
24.2 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
0.15 %/yr slower
Weight
37.8 kg
24.2 kg
13.6 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
49.10 V
41.20 V
7.90 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.79 A
13.95 A
4.84 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.158 m²
0.948 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power
41.20 V
34.60 V
6.60 V apart
Current at max power
17.75 A
13.17 A
4.58 A apart
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1903x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1903x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CS7N-730TB-AG
24,493 kWh
CS6L-455MS
14,746 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,747 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CS7N-730TB-AG
CS6L-455MS
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
730 W
455 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
698 W
432 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
666 W
409 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
635 W
385 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CS7N-730TB-AG
CS6L-455MS
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
730 Wp
455 Wp
+275 W for CS7N-730TB-AG
Module efficiency
23.50 %
21.10 %
+2.40 pp for CS7N-730TB-AG
Power density
235.0 Wp/m²
210.8 Wp/m²
+24.2 Wp/m² for CS7N-730TB-AG
Open-circuit voltage
49.10 V
41.20 V
7.90 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.20 V
34.60 V
6.60 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.79 A
13.95 A
4.84 A apart
Current at max power
17.75 A
13.17 A
4.58 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for CS7N-730TB-AG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1903x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1903x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.158 m²
0.948 m² apart
Weight
37.8 kg
24.2 kg
-13.6 kg for CS6L-455MS
Weight per kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
53.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for CS7N-730TB-AG
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
-0.15 %/yr for CS7N-730TB-AG
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#716
vs
#9,297
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 8,581 places
Power density
#800
vs
#9,534
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 8,734 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#8,778
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 6,613 places
Weight
#5,151
vs
#7,011
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 1,860 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,798
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#312
vs
#10,780
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 10,468 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-725TB-AG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-720TB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-715TB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-710TB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-705TB-AG
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-700TB-AG
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG or Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS?
According to our database: Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 21.10%); Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG and Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS?
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS is 21.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG use vs Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS?
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG uses TOPCon cells; Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG and Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS?
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG and Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS bifacial panels?
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Canadian Solar CS6L-455MS is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 38 Canadian Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

