Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG
VS
The verdict
CS7N-660MB-AG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CS7N-660MB-AG
CS3W-445MB-AG
Difference
Module efficiency
21.20 %
19.90 %
1.30 pp more efficient
Rated power
660 Wp
445 Wp
215 W more power
Power density
212.5 Wp/m²
199.2 Wp/m²
13.3 Wp/m² higher
Weight
37.9 kg
28.4 kg
9.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
57.4 kg/kWp
63.8 kg/kWp
6.4 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current
18.47 A
11.54 A
6.93 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.234 m²
0.872 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
45.40 V
48.90 V
3.50 V apart
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Current at max power
17.24 A
10.89 A
6.35 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
38.30 V
40.90 V
2.60 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2132x1048x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2132x1048x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CS7N-660MB-AG
22,144 kWh
CS3W-445MB-AG
14,931 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,213 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CS7N-660MB-AG
CS3W-445MB-AG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
660 W
445 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
626 W
422 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
593 W
398 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
559 W
375 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CS7N-660MB-AG
CS3W-445MB-AG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
660 Wp
445 Wp
+215 W for CS7N-660MB-AG
Module efficiency
21.20 %
19.90 %
+1.30 pp for CS7N-660MB-AG
Power density
212.5 Wp/m²
199.2 Wp/m²
+13.3 Wp/m² for CS7N-660MB-AG
Open-circuit voltage
45.40 V
48.90 V
3.50 V apart
Voltage at max power
38.30 V
40.90 V
2.60 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.47 A
11.54 A
6.93 A apart
Current at max power
17.24 A
10.89 A
6.35 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for CS7N-660MB-AG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2132x1048x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2132x1048x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.234 m²
0.872 m² apart
Weight
37.9 kg
28.4 kg
-9.5 kg for CS3W-445MB-AG
Weight per kWp
57.4 kg/kWp
63.8 kg/kWp
-6.4 kg/kWp for CS7N-660MB-AG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
-
Not published by Canadian Solar
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#9,076
vs
#12,331
CS7N-660MB-AG leads by 3,255 places
Power density
#8,959
vs
#12,319
CS7N-660MB-AG leads by 3,360 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#10,419
CS7N-660MB-AG leads by 1,641 places
Weight
#11,206
vs
#12,932
CS7N-660MB-AG leads by 1,726 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,228
vs
#11,245
CS7N-660MB-AG leads by 8,017 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-670MB-AG
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-665MB-AG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-655MB-AG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-650MB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG or Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG?
According to our database: Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG has higher module efficiency (21.20% vs 19.90%); Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG has a module efficiency of 21.20%, while Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG is 19.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG use vs Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG uses PERC cells; Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG bifacial panels?
Both Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 38 Canadian Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

