Canadian Solar CS6W-585T vs AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.50 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CS6W-585T
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Difference
Module efficiency
22.60 %
24.10 %
1.50 pp more efficient
Rated power
585 Wp
650 Wp
65 W more power
Power density
226.5 Wp/m²
240.6 Wp/m²
14.2 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight
27.6 kg
32.5 kg
4.9 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current
14.00 A
16.62 A
2.62 A apart
Module area
2.583 m²
2.701 m²
0.118 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
52.40 V
49.30 V
3.10 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Weight per kWp
47.2 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Current at max power
13.52 A
15.48 A
1.96 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power
43.30 V
42.00 V
1.30 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CS6W-585T
19,628 kWh
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
21,978 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,350 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CS6W-585T
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
585 W
650 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
560 W
625 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
534 W
599 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
509 W
574 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CS6W-585T
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
585 Wp
650 Wp
+65 W for AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Module efficiency
22.60 %
24.10 %
+1.50 pp for AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Power density
226.5 Wp/m²
240.6 Wp/m²
+14.2 Wp/m² for AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Open-circuit voltage
52.40 V
49.30 V
3.10 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.30 V
42.00 V
1.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.00 A
16.62 A
2.62 A apart
Current at max power
13.52 A
15.48 A
1.96 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.701 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight
27.6 kg
32.5 kg
-4.9 kg for CS6W-585T
Weight per kWp
47.2 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
-2.8 kg/kWp for CS6W-585T
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,658
vs
#219
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw leads by 3,439 places
Power density
#3,500
vs
#233
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw leads by 3,267 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#1,536
vs
#3,317
CS6W-585T leads by 1,781 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,059
vs
#884
AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw leads by 3,175 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-635
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-625
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-615
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS6W-585T or AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 22.60%); AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS6W-585T and AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw?
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw is 24.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS6W-585T use vs AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw?
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T uses TOPCon cells; AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS6W-585T and AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw?
Canadian Solar CS6W-585T has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS6W-585T and AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw bifacial panels?
AIKO AIKO-A650-GRH66Dw is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Canadian Solar CS6W-585T is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 40 Canadian Solar offers · See 167 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

