Skip to main content
NSBK-33-715 vs HSBK-33-725 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

BYD NSBK-33-715 vs BYD HSBK-33-725

BYD NSBK-33-715
BYD
NSBK-33-715
715 Wp 23.03 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
BYD HSBK-33-725
BYD
HSBK-33-725
725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

HSBK-33-725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.038 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter NSBK-33-715 HSBK-33-725 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.278 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.038 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.03 % 23.34 % 0.31 pp more efficient
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 715 Wp 725 Wp 10 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 49.22 V 50.27 V 1.05 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NSBK-33-715
23,990 kWh
HSBK-33-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NSBK-33-715 HSBK-33-725
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 685 W 699 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.7% of rated power 655 W 673 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.5% of rated power 626 W 647 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NSBK-33-715 HSBK-33-725 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 725 Wp +10 W for HSBK-33-725
Module efficiency 23.03 % 23.34 % +0.31 pp for HSBK-33-725
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for HSBK-33-725
Open-circuit voltage 49.22 V 50.27 V 1.05 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.38 V 42.23 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.23 A 18.26 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.28 A 17.18 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.278 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.038 %/°C for HSBK-33-725
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.3 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,744 vs #943
HSBK-33-725 leads by 801 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #936
HSBK-33-725 leads by 1,082 places
Heat behaviour
#1,295 vs #13
HSBK-33-725 leads by 1,282 places
Weight
#7,566 vs #6,514
HSBK-33-725 leads by 1,052 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#664 vs #403
HSBK-33-725 leads by 261 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NSBK-33-715 vs BYD NSBK-33-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NSBK-33-715 vs BYD NSBK-33-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NSBK-33-715 vs BYD NSBK-33-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NSBK-33-715 vs BYD NSBK-33-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NSBK-33-715 vs BYD NSBK-33-695
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NSBK-33-715 vs BYD NSBK-33-690
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: BYD NSBK-33-715 or BYD HSBK-33-725?
According to our database: BYD HSBK-33-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.03%); BYD HSBK-33-725 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.278%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of BYD NSBK-33-715 and BYD HSBK-33-725?
BYD NSBK-33-715 has a module efficiency of 23.03%, while BYD HSBK-33-725 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does BYD NSBK-33-715 use vs BYD HSBK-33-725?
BYD NSBK-33-715 uses TOPCon cells; BYD HSBK-33-725 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on BYD NSBK-33-715 and BYD HSBK-33-725?
BYD NSBK-33-715 has a 30 years power warranty; BYD HSBK-33-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are BYD NSBK-33-715 and BYD HSBK-33-725 bifacial panels?
Both BYD NSBK-33-715 and BYD HSBK-33-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.