Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 vs Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
VS
The verdict
9 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 40 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Difference
Rated power
640 Wp
600 Wp
40 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
56.61 V
52.10 V
4.51 V apart
Module area
2.795 m²
2.583 m²
0.212 m² apart
Weight
34.7 kg
32.1 kg
2.6 kg lighter
Module efficiency
22.90 %
23.20 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Power density
229.0 Wp/m²
232.3 Wp/m²
3.3 Wp/m² higher
Cell count
156
144
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
46.79 V
43.78 V
3.01 V apart
Dimensions
2465x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2465x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640
21,473 kWh
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
20,131 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,342 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
640 W
600 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
612 W
574 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
584 W
548 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
556 W
522 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
640 Wp
600 Wp
+40 W for CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640
Module efficiency
22.90 %
23.20 %
+0.30 pp for CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Power density
229.0 Wp/m²
232.3 Wp/m²
+3.3 Wp/m² for CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Open-circuit voltage
56.61 V
52.10 V
4.51 V apart
Voltage at max power
46.79 V
43.78 V
3.01 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.35 A
14.61 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.68 A
13.70 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2465x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.795 m²
2.583 m²
0.212 m² apart
Weight
34.7 kg
32.1 kg
-2.6 kg for CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Weight per kWp
54.2 kg/kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,359
vs
#1,306
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 leads by 1,053 places
Power density
#2,389
vs
#1,252
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 leads by 1,137 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,447
vs
#7,477
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 leads by 970 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,704
vs
#2,413
CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 leads by 709 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 650W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-645
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-645W
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 or Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 has higher module efficiency (23.20% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 and Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600?
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 use vs Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600?
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 and Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600?
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 and Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640 and Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

