Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
VS
The verdict
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
Difference
Module efficiency
24.10 %
23.20 %
0.90 pp more efficient
Rated power
650 Wp
720 Wp
70 W more power
Weight
31.6 kg
38.0 kg
6.4 kg lighter
Power density
240.6 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
8.9 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
16.58 A
18.58 A
2.00 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight per kWp
48.7 kg/kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
4.1 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
15.39 A
17.64 A
2.25 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power
42.24 V
40.81 V
1.43 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
21,809 kWh
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,348 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
650 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
622 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
593 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
565 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
650 Wp
720 Wp
+70 W for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
Module efficiency
24.10 %
23.20 %
+0.90 pp for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
Power density
240.6 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+8.9 Wp/m² for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
Open-circuit voltage
49.87 V
49.17 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.24 V
40.81 V
1.43 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.58 A
18.58 A
2.00 A apart
Current at max power
15.39 A
17.64 A
2.25 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
31.6 kg
38.0 kg
-6.4 kg for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
Weight per kWp
48.7 kg/kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
-4.1 kg/kWp for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#219
vs
#1,306
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W leads by 1,087 places
Power density
#233
vs
#1,347
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W leads by 1,114 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,420
vs
#6,459
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W leads by 4,039 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#866
vs
#339
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 leads by 527 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-645W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-645
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-640W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-640
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-635W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W or Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650 W has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 23.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720?
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650 W has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W use vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720?
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650 W uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720?
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650 W has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650 W and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

