Skip to main content
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ

Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710
710 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
670 Wp 24.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.90 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ Difference
Module efficiency 22.90 % 24.80 % 1.90 pp more efficient
Rated power 710 Wp 670 Wp 40 W more power
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² 19.5 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight 38.0 kg 32.0 kg 6.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 47.8 kg/kWp 5.8 kg/kWp lighter
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Short-circuit current 18.48 A 16.87 A 1.61 A apart
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count 132 264 132 cells apart
Current at max power 17.54 A 16.09 A 1.45 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 41.65 V 1.17 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710
23,822 kWh
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 679 W 644 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 648 W 618 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 617 W 592 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 670 Wp +40 W for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710
Module efficiency 22.90 % 24.80 % +1.90 pp for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² +19.5 Wp/m² for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Open-circuit voltage 48.77 V 49.58 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 41.65 V 1.17 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.48 A 16.87 A 1.61 A apart
Current at max power 17.54 A 16.09 A 1.45 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 38.0 kg 32.0 kg -6.0 kg for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 47.8 kg/kWp -5.8 kg/kWp for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 264 132 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,359 vs #12
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 2,347 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #14
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 2,460 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #511
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#7,492 vs #1,884
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 5,608 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#576 vs #295
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 281 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 or Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 22.90%); Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 use vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 36 Astronergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.