Skip to main content
ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W vs CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W vs Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600

ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W
435 Wp 22.30 % TOPCon
VS
Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
600 Wp 23.20 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 Difference
Module efficiency 22.30 % 23.20 % 0.90 pp more efficient
Rated power 435 Wp 600 Wp 165 W more power
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² 9.5 Wp/m² higher
Weight 21.3 kg 32.1 kg 10.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 38.60 V 52.10 V 13.50 V apart
Module area 1.953 m² 2.583 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight per kWp 49.0 kg/kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 4.5 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 32.44 V 43.78 V 11.34 V apart
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W
14,595 kWh
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
20,131 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,536 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 600 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 416 W 574 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 397 W 548 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 378 W 522 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 600 Wp +165 W for CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Module efficiency 22.30 % 23.20 % +0.90 pp for CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² +9.5 Wp/m² for CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600
Open-circuit voltage 38.60 V 52.10 V 13.50 V apart
Voltage at max power 32.44 V 43.78 V 11.34 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.19 A 14.61 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.41 A 13.70 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.953 m² 2.583 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight 21.3 kg 32.1 kg -10.8 kg for ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W
Weight per kWp 49.0 kg/kWp 53.5 kg/kWp -4.5 kg/kWp for ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,100 vs #1,306
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 leads by 3,794 places
Power density
#5,150 vs #1,252
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 leads by 3,898 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,656 vs #7,477
ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W leads by 4,821 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,115 vs #2,413
CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 leads by 6,702 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W vs Astronergy CHSM54N-HC-445
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W vs Astronergy CHSM54N-HC-445W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W vs Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-445W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W vs Astronergy CHSM54N-HC-440
2 differences, the largest is cell technology
Same series, other bin
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W vs Astronergy CHSM54N-HC-440W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W vs Astronergy CHSM54N(BL)-HC 440W
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W or Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 has higher module efficiency (23.20% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W and Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600?
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435 W has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W use vs Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600?
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435 W uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W and Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600?
Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435 W has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435W and Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 bifacial panels?
Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH 600 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Astronergy ASTRO N5s CHSM54N-HC-435 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.